We provide you with original test templates, perfect formatting and style The rule of law doctrine has been adopted in the Indian Constitution. The ideals of the constitution, justice. Freedom and equality are enshrined in the preamble. The Constitution of India is the supreme law of the land and other laws are required in accordance with the Constitution. In addition, any law that violates any provision of the Constitution will be declared invalid. Part III of the Constitution of India guarantees fundamental rights. It should be added that Article 13(1) of the Constitution provides that all laws in force in the territory of India immediately before the coming into force of the Constitution, to the extent that they are incompatible with the fundamental rights provision of Part III, shall be void to the extent of such inconsistency. In addition, article 13, paragraph 2, provides that the State shall not enact a law that suppresses or restricts fundamental rights and that laws that violate this clause are void to the extent of the violation. The Constitution of India guarantees equality before the law and equal protection of the law.
Article 21 guarantees the right to life and personal liberty. It provides that no one shall be deprived of his life or personal liberty unless this is done in accordance with the procedure prescribed by law. Article 19(1)(a) guarantees the third principle of the rule of law, namely freedom of speech and opinion. Criminal Record: North Carolina inmates have filed a lawsuit in U.S. District Court. The detainees claimed that the State`s failure to place them in legal research institutes denied them access to the courts, in violation of […] Furthermore, in Veena Sethi v. In the state of Bihar [7], the Supreme Court also extended the scope of the rule of law to the poor, who make up most of India, ruling that the rule of law does not apply only to those who have the means to fight for their rights and extending the principle of standing to help the poor. The courts should review subordinate and parliamentary laws. Ensuring respect for the rule of law is even more important Courts play an essential role in upholding the rule of law, especially when they hear complaints from minority groups or persons who may have minority views. Equality before the law is so integral to the U.S. system of government that when a majority, intentionally or unintentionally, violates the rights of a minority, the Court sees fit to hear both sides of the controversy in court.
We can write you a personalized essay that follows your exact instructions and meets deadlines. Let us correct your notes together! Sorry, we couldn`t paraphrase this essay. Our professional writers can rewrite it and provide you with a unique article. This essay was given by a student and was probably used and filed before the Supreme Court declared that section 14 violated arbitrariness. In the case of Indira Gandhi Nehru vs. Raj Narayan,[3] Article 329-A was published on the 39th anniversary of the Holocaust. Amendment to the Constitution providing certain immunities for the election of the post of Prime Minister before judicial review. The Supreme Court declared Article 329-A invalid because it shortens the fundamental structure of the constitution. In Raman Dayaram Shetty v. International Airport Authority of India,[4] the Supreme Court held that the broad purpose of the rule of law is to protect individuals from arbitrary exercise of power wherever they may be. In the case of A.D.M Jabalpur vs., Shivakant Shukla [5] also known as the habeas corpus case. A large number of people were arrested under the Internal Security Maintenance Act of 1971 without disclosing the reasons for their arrest.
After the declaration of the state of emergency. In this case, however, the Court ruled that Article 21 is our rule of law. If it is suspended, there is no rule of law. The majority decision ruled that the Constitution is the mandate and the rule of law. In addition, Sheela Barse v. In the state of Maharashtra [6], the Supreme Court ruled on fairness to women in police custody and also drafted a code of guidelines for the protection of prisoners in police custody, particularly women. The case study preferred Shahida, a fashion designer who competes with a local art gallery, Benjamin`s Looking Glass. The dispute is about Shahida who filed a lawsuit against the art gallery for giving her a fake […] In addition, Article 19 guarantees Indian citizens six fundamental freedoms. (1) freedom of expression and opinion, (2) freedom of assembly, (3) freedom to form associations or trade unions, (4) freedom to live in any part of Indian territory and (5) freedom of occupation, (6) profession, commerce or business.
However, the rights deriving from these freedoms are not absolute, but are subject to appropriate restrictions that the State may impose in accordance with article 19, paragraph 2, of the Constitution. Article 20 (1) of the Constitution provides that no one shall be convicted of a criminal offence unless it is a violation of a law in force at the time the offence was committed and is not liable to a heavier penalty than that which would have been imposed by law at the time the offence was committed. Article 20, paragraph 2, provides that no one may be prosecuted and punished more than once for the same offence. In addition, Article 20, paragraph 3, specifies that no person charged with the offence may be compelled to testify against himself. In India, the importance of the rule of law has increased considerably. It is now considered part of the basic structure of the Constitution and therefore cannot even be abrogated or destroyed by Parliament. It is also considered part of natural justice. In Kesavanda Bharti v. State of Kerala[1], the Supreme Court has stated that the rule of law is one of the most important aspects of the doctrine of basic structure. In addition, Alexander Hamilton, James Madison and John Jay published a series of essays in Menaka Gandhi vs. Union of India[2] more than 200 years ago that promoted the ratification of the United States Constitution, now known as the Federalist Papers. In explaining the need for an independent judiciary, Alexander Hamilton noted in The Federalist #78 that the federal courts were “designed as an intermediary between the people and their legislature” to ensure that the people`s representatives acted only within the authority conferred on Congress by the Constitution.
Mark Dimunation talks about the Federalist Papers. The collection of 85 essays by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison and John Jay was written between 1787 and 1788 to encourage states to ratify the Constitution. The doctrine of the rule of law can be divided into two categories. First, whether the law must meet standards that also allow for efficiency to guide measures. Second, the various legal enforcement mechanisms should not deprive the law of its ability to lead through distorted enforcement, and they should monitor respect for the rule of law and, in addition, provide effective remedies in case of derogation. Some principles of the doctrine are as follows: The idea of the rule of law is one of the building blocks of a modern democratic society. Moreover, laws are made for the well-being of people in order to maintain peace and harmony between conflicting forces in society. In addition, one of the main objectives of the legislation is the maintenance of public order in society and the development of a peaceful environment for the advancement of the population. Therefore, the concept of the rule of law plays an important role in this process. The rule of law is old and an old ideal.
As discussed by ancient Greek philosophers such as Plato and Aristotle around 350 BC. Peloton his writings on the idea of the rule of law: “When the law is subject to another authority and has no own, the collapse of the state is not far away, in my opinion; But if the law is the master of government and the government is its slave, then the situation is full of promise and people enjoy all the blessings that the gods pour out on a state. Similarly, Aristotle supported the concept of the rule of law by writing that “the law should govern and those in power should be servants of the law.” The term derives from the French expression “La Principe de légalité”, the principle of legality, which, moreover, refers to a government based on the principles of law and not on human principles. In a much broader sense, the rule of law means that the law is above each individual. On the contrary, the concept of the rule of law emphasizes the procedure established by law, according to which the authority of the State can be exercised only in accordance with written laws. The independence of the judiciary must be guaranteed. The rules on the independence of the judiciary, the procedure for appointing judges, the security of their mandate, the determination of their salaries and other conditions of service are intended to ensure that they are free from external pressure and independent of any authority other than that of the law.
Recent Comments