Select Page

Soon after, they parted, with a sarcastic laugh from the Spaniard, and Ma`amselle mingled with the crowd. These sample phrases are automatically selected from various online information sources to reflect the current use of the word “shared”. The views expressed in the examples do not represent the views of Merriam-Webster or its editors. Send us your feedback. The astronomer plunged into his tired path, another example of a fool and his money soon parted. Britannica English: Translation of “parted” for Arabic speakers The court concluded that the tenant had not parted with possession of the premises. Case law has repeatedly given alliances against ownership separation a strict and narrow meaning. It was held that “nothing less than a complete exclusion of the grantor or licensor from lawful possession for all purposes is severance of possession”. The judge noted that “the decisive test for possession, as opposed to mere employment, is the right of the individual to exclude others, including the tenant, from the premises.” In this case, Ford exercised an increased degree of control over the site from the signing of the terms and conditions in 2007 until the application for a sublease licence in November 2011. The court found that control related to control of the business operating on the site and not Ford`s ability to control the tenant`s access. The tenant had not completely evaded possession and therefore does not violate the lease.

Through a spokesman, Klaus does not deny that he and Cato have separated. If the co-owners cannot agree on the value of the property and its legitimate shares, they can choose a disinterested third party, such as an arbitrator or appraiser, to divide the property and allocate the shares. A voluntary division by all co-owners is legally valid, unless its recognition is contractually disputed. These challenges include allegations of fraud or unscrupulousness, or allegations that the parties are attempting to defraud a third party by agreeing to the split. Many lawmakers are, of course, skeptical, as the two groups officially split last winter. Suddenly, the crowd parted and made way for a man who approached us in a hunched motion. When the tenant asked the landlord for consent to sublet in 2011, he was denied. The landlord alleged that the tenant breached the lease because he relinquished the premises to Ford. “Shared.” Dictionary, Merriam-Webster,

Retrieved 25 November 2022. In short, the exile and the girl fell in love, and they vowed never to be separated, but only by force. During the walk, Harry had the opportunity to tell Lawrence a lot about what had happened to him since their breakup. When father and son joined the count, they met as if they had separated the day before. The case reminds us that possession and employment are separate legal concepts and that the real test is whether the tenant has fully transferred his or her right to exclude others from the premises. (ii) to the extent that the holder has disposed at that time of the money or monetary value (as defined in paragraph (a)(3) of this Section). For the purposes of paragraph (a)(1) of this Section, a contractual right (as defined in Article 70.232(c)(2)(i) of this Part) exists at the time the contract is entered into. A claim (within the meaning of Article 70.232(c)(2)(ii) of this Part) exists if and to the extent that a claim for payment is based on enforcement. A security right referred to in point (a) of this Section exists at the time its priority in respect of a mortgage is established. For example, to obtain priority under section 70.145(a) of this Part, a security right as defined in paragraph (a) of this Division must exist prior to the filing of a notice of lien. On Tuesday, a representative for Sitrick Co.

confirmed that they parted ways with Epstein in April 2011. Before we parted, he reminded me once more as I walked to my car to read “Why Men Love War.” (3) Reasonable and full consideration in money or monetary value. For the purposes of paragraph (f) of this section, “reasonable and full consideration in money or monetary value” means consideration in money or monetary value that is proportional to the actual value of the property acquired. See paragraph (a)(3) of this section for the definition of currency or monetary value. Reasonable and full consideration in money or monetary value may include consideration in a bona fide purchase. The term also includes consideration in a transaction where the buyer has not performed an obligation, such as consideration in a hire purchase agreement where the buyer has not paid for delivery. (3) Money or monetary value. For the purposes of paragraph (a) of this Division, the term “money or monetary value” includes money, security (as defined in paragraph (d) of this Division), tangible or intangible assets, services and other consideration that may be reduced to monetary value. Money or monetary value also includes any consideration that would otherwise constitute money or monetary value within the meaning of the preceding sentence, of which a person separated before the security right would otherwise exist, if, under domestic law, the consideration is sufficient to support an agreement giving rise to a security right.

A waiver or promise of a dowry, curtesy or legal succession created in lieu of dowry or curtesy, or other matrimonial rights, is not consideration in money or monetary value. Nor is love and affection, the promise of marriage, or any other consideration that cannot be reduced to monetary value, being something in money or monetary value. “CCA`s new newsstand is one of the best electronic resources I have come across in 21 years of labour law. The information is up-to-date, useful and easy to navigate. Thank you for offering it and please continue indefinitely!! (ii) a written performance contract for the purchase or lease of real property, (iii) an option to purchase or lease real property and all shares therein, or (g) a creditor of judicial privilege. The term pledge refers to a person who has obtained a final judgment from a registered and competent court for the recovery of specially designated property or for a certain sum of money. In the case of a judgment on the recovery of a certain sum of money, a pledgee is a person who has made a lien enforceable on the basis of the judgment on the property in question. A lien on judgment is not perfected until the identity of the creditor, the property subject to the lien and the amount of the lien have been established.

Accordingly, a judicial lien does not include a lien of seizure or seizure until the lien has become a judgment, even if the privilege of the judgment relates to an earlier date under local law. If registration or registration is required under local law before a judgment becomes effective against third parties who acquire liens in immovable property, a judicial lien under that local law will not be made effective against real property before the date of registration or indictment.

Open chat
bonjour comment nous pouvons vous aider